Wikipedia

Search results

Showing posts with label the life of the world. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the life of the world. Show all posts

Monday, April 7, 2025

#508

In these uncertain times, philosophy is the only consolation. I have looked elsewhere, and found comfort only in Final Fantasy games. Other video games too, I guess. Art. NieR: Automata is a complete review and proof of existentialism made digital sculpture, so that has been an exceptionally consoling game. Its glorious, unerring purpose is ripping your heart into bloody soup chunks and trapping you in a pointless, endless loop of meaningless action and empty, inescapable violence--just like life, and death brings no escape, no surcease. It is so fucking good. 

Also I have been listening to the soundtrack a lot. Consoling stuff. 2-B's ass is also admittedly consoling in the extreme, which is very funny when you think about it. The game is filled with great jokes and profound beauties and pleasures. This does not blunt its slow, merciless edge, nor soften its killing blows in the slightest.

*

Never been able to nor ever sincerely wished to separate philosophy from art, nor art from philosophy. Both are life; not its purpose, not its meaning, but literally all there is to and within life. This beingness, this world-aperture that perceives the infinite universe, is art, is philosophy. The act of creation-perception that has been my embodiment and the chronophenomenon it has occupied--my body on the world, in history, acting out its part in a story on a stage which is the art philosophic, the life of the world.

*

It's a trip, as they say. All there is is to ride it out.


--JL

Thursday, November 25, 2021

#265

Wonder if I ought to recover the twitter account I attached to the running of this blog, way back when. 'Twas only good for a couple hits a day, and twitter literally breaks my fragile mind, but it is ahead on page one google search of my actual author page on amazon, where my content lives. The top result on google relating to me and my activities is post number twenty-seven, where I mentioned Google+ and Blogger in the same sentence. Soon this post, too, will enjoy unwarranted spotlight action. Ha! 

Man, visiting twitter in order to inform this decision was like briskly rubbing a sheaf of sandpaper across my bare abdomen. One clean stripe of burning, unnecessary pain. I have said my piece about twitter in this text field, don't need to go over it all again. Some would say it would be hypocritical of me to even consider using twitter to garner readership or communicate ideas, given what I have said about their foul dark magics in the past.

In fact, I feel quite unfettered. Twitter's brand of petty evil is exactly the sort whose combat momentum is best thwarted by the gymnastic of hypocrisy. Of course, this gives one pause to wonder if that is not yet another level in the basement of their cruel and barbarous factory. Naturally, one does need a twitter account in order to criticize twitter on home turf, in order to win the hearts and minds of those afflicted by twitter most directly. 

The account does serve as the blog's alt text, which makes it an archive, and since it does already exist, and since I--wait. No. As information addict, as twitter addict, as completionist--all these truths about myself in their competition and complicity cried out together just now, and the answer must, can only be, no. That way lies madness and personal demise.

Last time I talked about twitter was that long, long Sinfest post, a post basically also about twitter, and way too much other shit. Drove across every goddamn lane I could in that post. Not sorry, but it was indeed something of an act of ridiculous lunacy, and the most exaggerated overtures in that direction were fueled by looking at twitter for all of five fucking minutes. Brain poison. The answer is no. Been sounding like an asshole up in here. No.

If only I could close that account. Such a thing, in this day and age, is impossible; moreso because I have forgotten and lost the relevant access data. So hey, this whole thing has been a total wash.

*

Read the title of the blog one more time, motherfuckers, and have a happy turkeygobble day; good day for shoving that turkeybird up in your gobblehole


--JL


*originally was going to write a post about something else entirely. I've forgotten what that was now twice as I loaded up the text field. Hmm. Well, it's nice to be here again. Always happy to be with you for even one moment more, dear reader. 

Oh! I was going to discuss how sometimes I feel as though the way the blog repeats itself and revisits certain topics again and again and again is in one way something of a failure, speaking in terms of pure creative fertility. Here in this text field I have been extremely disparaging of the Achewood man, the man of Achewood, for basically quitting the strip because he didn't want to plow any furrowed ground, and of course I am disparaging of him because I am of a similar bent in my nature. Aware that there is nothing new to be written here under the sun, nevertheless the compulsion is to offer freshness, dammit. Cooking requires base parts which, at the time you do something to them with the intent of transforming them into an ingredient, must be fresh. It doesn't matter if we are talking about a tomato, an idea, or the idea of a tomato; even the idea a tomato might have. What matters is the freshness of the ingredient, and of course what technique you apply to deliver the payload, which is flavor. Flavor is everything, everything, fucking everything.

Musically speaking: there are only eight notes. With eight notes we must make infinite multiverses of permutations. Repetition is integral to permutation, and without pattern, there is only meaninglessness, which is only interesting and valid in the context of that which has meaning. So, in the end, I have to say to myself whatever, I don't care if I repeat myself for seventy years. Who cares about playing the same song every day. Everything is in how the chord is played in this newly minted and never-before lived moment, the little improvisations, the age of the strings, the little variations in the pressure of the fingers and the stroke and tension of the arm. Do birds worry about repeating themselves? They sing every morning and maybe it's identical and maybe it's completely different each time, but at the day it's fuckin birdsong, which is what it is, and what more do you want.

What you do can be the same, but the way that you do it, who you are and what you bring, that's different every day like it or not, and being as aware of that and the necessity of that, the structure of arcs and loops and wheels and parallels that make up our lives except when it all comes crashing down around us, or when we leap off the rails and throw ourselves into formlessness that will either develop fresh structure out of itself or be our demise--that is what makes existing within the structure of repetitious fractals bearable and even majestic. 

Yeah, whatever. Maybe I've said all this before, in so many ways. I think of posts I've written where I discuss helical structures diametrically opposing one another yet both essential to the superstructure of reality, of posts I wrote about the world being a forest, the universe as forest, of reality composed of infinite simultaneously disrupted and flawlessly perfect spheres, simultaneously homogenous in their perfection and representing spectra ranged between two poles. Or it's all the layers and angles of bismuth, levels and levels and spars and spars, regular and varied. Or everything being part of an infinite and infinitely expanding and collapsing crystal structure, irrationally perfect and not even real, but the only reality there is.

Again, whatever. So fucking what? Who gives a shit how long a scene is, to paraphrase David Lynch? I get off on writing that kind of shit. I get off on writing. As long as that's true, I'll churn out whatever weird crap I want and sell it by the pound.

All this by way of saying, apologies to the Achewood man for being a jerk to him (indirectly) about his choices. They are, of course, his own to make, as all our choices do be also.

Monday, May 3, 2021

#238

What news, I ask myself, is worth recording? I ask purely in a sense of what would be fun for me, then try to winnow down into what might be entertaining for others. Then I have to play with the cat, for she, too, cries for entertainment. Just as in humans, this ludic need seems to be both fickle and bottomless.

Do I have any bright ideas, I ask, if I don't feel like news or the delights of minutiae. 

April did not prove itself a month of bright ideas. The cat played a lot, though. Both cats. Each cat unit.

*

Every avenue of thought is made up of more traps and pitfalls for the thinker than any kind of clear passage. There exists no thought so pure that the vanity and arrogance of the thinker cannot mar, no thought so sensitive or fine that a callous or brutal personality could not fashion into a weapon for itself, no healing that a tortured person cannot turn to pain. If truth exists, and is absolute, then it is a good and fine thing, but not utile for the "thinking" ape. We will not be able to agree upon it, no matter how it manifests, and it would be boring if we did. Truly, it would signal the perhaps irretrievable end of something vital, something human. At any rate, the truth will continue to be, without needing anyone to acknowledge it anyway.   

I was thinking that, and just now I thought abut how personality has no gender; it is affected by gender and gender as experienced in embodiment, but the personality itself is referred to as the personality itself, while we think of a person as a them, not an it. But since the personality can be said to be the person, and indeed the most personable part of any person, should it not be thought of as the primary part of the person? Well, it is, and it is an it: the it that thinks that it is he, or she, they, me, or you. And who knows how much other nonsense, this thing, this it, believes and thinks! Hilarious.

In the end, we can only gather to ourselves our notions which approach what we believe may be the truth, and serve them best we may. 

*

The man is all vaxxed up and fully incubated, folks, and how very brave new world it all is. Our advance into the delightful blend of the Orwell, P.K. Dick, and Huxley futures marches apace! The other Huxley future, the more sublimely Nietzschean vision of a spiritually reborn and wholly revalued world, still has its chance, I believe. I also believe that a lot of the people saying so in so many ways are trading with false coin, but that does not worry me unduly anymore. 

When I was a kid I wanted the world and its climate and ecosystems fixed, the truth discovered, enshrined, and set as the highest possible good, and all the human choir to sing with one voice the body electric and the universal tone. This is still my dream, but I have come to understand that this dream is not for me. I live in a world whose systems are in violent transition--all its systems. The truth is further away from us than I could ever have known as a child, when I held it in my mind, obvious and perfect. Our riot, our chaotic disharmony, which hurts and strains the ear so, has its perfection and its tone is as universal as every tone. Each life is small to the life of this small world, each as essential to it as it to each of us. 

Let the process go. River's gonna flow. 


--JL